Factor analysis and validation of the Bush Francis catatonia rating scale-Spain version

Background and objectives The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Bush Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument and Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale Spain Version (BFCSI-SV and BFCRS-SV) using the ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria as well as other catatonia scales. Methods One hundred patients were admitted to the inpatient psychiatry unit at Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol and two psychiatrists administered the BFCRS-SV to the first 10 patients to assess inter-rater reliability. The BFCRS-SV, BFCSI-SV, Modified Rogers Scale (MRS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scales, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale, and Modified Simpson-Angus Scale were then employed. Results The results showed that 27% of patients had catatonia using the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. Additionally, 51% of patients had 2 or more BFCRSI-SV items (Sensitivity: 100%; Specificity: 67.12%). The alpha coefficient values were 0.80 and 0.84 for the BFCSI-SV and BFCRS-SV, respectively, and the intraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.902 and 0.903. The area under the ROC curve was 0.971 and 0.96, and the instruments had a strong positive correlation with the DSM-5 score, ICD-11 score, and MRS. The study identified a three-factor model comprising the inhibition, excitement, and parakinetic dimensions. Conclusions Overall, the results suggest that the BFCSI-SV and BFCRS-SV are valid and reliable tools for the diagnosis of catatonia, especially when using a cut-off score of 5 or higher for the BFCSI-SV and 7 or higher for the BFCRS-SV. (AU)

Catatonia and Cognitive Impairments: A Systematic Review.

Background: Catatonia is an underdiagnosed and undertreated neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by catalepsy, negativism, mutism, muscular rigidity, and mannerism, often accompanied by autonomic instability and fever. Although there is growing interest in studying cognitive impairments before and after catatonia, little is known about the cognitive features of the syndrome. Methods: This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022299091). Using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach, we searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, and PsycArticles using a combination of the terms "Catatonia" and "Cognitive impairment" and "Executive function" and "Frontal lobe" and "Parietal lobe." Studies included original research articles enrolling patients with catatonic syndrome according to specified criteria. Fourteen studies were deemed relevant for inclusion. The abstraction form included age, assessment during acute episode, associated diagnosis, assessment procedure, and cognitive domains. Outcome measures were extracted. Results: Executive functions and visuospatial abilities proved to be the most investigated domains. A great heterogeneity has been observed in the assessment tools used among the 14 evaluated studies. Findings showed that catatonic patients had worse performance than healthy and non-catatonic psychiatric patients in frontal and parietal cortical functions. Conclusion: Because of the small number of studies in such heterogeneous areas and significant methodological limitations, the results should be regarded with caution. Future research assessing cognitive impairments on catatonic patients is needed. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=299091], identifier [CRD42022299091].

Catatonia: regreso al futuro del síndrome neuropsiquiátrico / Catatonia: Back to the future of the neuropsychiatric syndrome

La catatonia es un síndrome neuropsiquiátrico infratratado e infradiagnósticado cuyo pronóstico es benigno si se trata de forma precoz, evitando así posibles complicaciones y el compromiso de la salud de los pacientes. Los últimos estudios epidemiológicos señalan una prevalencia de catatonia del 9,2%, siendo frecuente tanto en las enfermedades médicas (especialmente en las neurológicas), como en las psiquiátricas. Es recomendable el uso de escalas validadas para su diagnóstico y poder medir la gravedad y la respuesta al tratamiento. Una vez identificada la catatonia, es necesario realizar un estudio diagnóstico protocolizado de la etiología subyacente («Catatonia Workup»). El tratamiento de elección son las benzodiacepinas y la terapia electroconvulsiva. En los últimos años, han surgido nuevas alternativas terapéuticas no invasivas, tales como la estimulación magnética transcraneal. En esta revisión, proponemos varias iniciativas para fomentar la difusión y el conocimiento de la catatonia en el ámbito clínico. (AU)

Catatonia is an undertreated and underdiagnosed neuropsychiatric syndrome whose prognosis is benign if treated early, thus avoiding possible complications and compromising the health of patients. The latest epidemiological studies indicate a prevalence of catatonia of 9.2%, being frequent in medical pathologies (especially neurological ones), as well as in psychiatric pathologies. The use of validated scales is recommended for its diagnosis, to be able to measure the severity and response to treatment. Once catatonia has been identified, it is necessary to perform a protocolized diagnostic study of the underlying aetiology («Catatonia Workup»). Treatment of choice is benzodiazepines and electroconvulsive therapy. In recent years, new therapeutic alternatives such as non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation have emerged. In this review we propose several initiatives to promote the dissemination and knowledge of catatonia in the clinical setting. (AU)

Assessment of a Primary Support Program: family physicians and mental health professionals' perspective.

BACKGROUND: Mental health (MH) disorders are increasingly prevalent in primary care (PC) and this has generated, in recent years, the development of strategies based on the collaborative model and the stepped care model. The Primary Support Program (PSP) was implemented in the community of Catalonia (Spain) during 2006 to improve, from the first level of care, treatment of the population with mild-moderate complexity MH problems along with identification and referral of severe cases to specialized care. The aim of the present study was to identify the strengths and limitations of the PSP from the perspective of health professionals involved in the programme. METHODS: An explanatory qualitative study based on Grounded Theory. We conducted group semistructured interviews with 37 family physicians and 34 MH professionals. A constant comparative method of analysis was performed. RESULTS: Operation of the PSP is influenced by internal factors, such as the programme framework, MH liaison, management of service supply and demand, and the professional team involved. Additionally, external factors which had an impact were related to the patient, the professionals, the Health System, and community resources. CONCLUSIONS: The operation of the PSP could benefit from a review of the programme framework and optimization of MH liaison. Improvements are also proposed for MH training in PC, intraprofessional coordination, use of community resources, and creation of efficient continuous assessment systems.

Suicidal behaviour in first-episode psychosis: The relevance of age, perceived stress and depressive symptoms.

The onset of first episode psychosis (FEP) is a period of increased risk of suicide, which is 60% higher than in other stages of the disease. This work explored suicidal behaviour and its most relevant factors in a population with FEP and a healthy control (HC) sample. We used the Suicide Risk Scale of Plutchik (SRSP) to assess suicide behaviour, and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were administered to assess the severity of depression, mania, psychosocial functioning, perceived stress and psychopathology, respectively. Patients with FEP showed a higher prevalence in all measures of suicide behaviour than HC. Younger age and depressive symptoms were the most important predictors of suicide ideation and suicide attempt. More perceived stress and higher hopelessness were the most relevant predictors of suicide risk. Symptoms did not appear to be important factors in suicide behaviour. Younger age, perceived stress and depressive symptoms seem to be the most important factors in suicide behaviours in FEP.

Association of serum interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein with depressive and adjustment disorders in COVID-19 inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Immune mechanisms are part of the pathophysiology of mental disorders, although their role remains controversial. In depressive disorders a chronic low-grade inflammatory process is observed, with higher interleukin-6 (IL-6) values. Furthermore, in SARS-CoV2 infection, which is closely related to depressive disorders, there is a proinflammatory cascade of cytokines that causes systemic inflammation. METHODS: The present study evaluates the relationship between IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) serum levels and the presence of depressive and adjustment disorders in a sample of 1851 patients admitted to hospital for SARS-CoV2 infection from March to November 2020. Concentrations of IL-6 and CRP were determined within the first 72 â€‹h at admission and compared among groups of patients according to previous history and current presence of depression or adjustment disorders. RESULTS: IL-6 serum levels were significantly higher in the group of patients with depression and adjustment disorders compared to patients without such disorders (114.25 â€‹pg/mL (SD, 225.44) vs. 86.41 (SD, 202.97)), even after adjusting for several confounders. Similar results were obtained for CRP (103.94 â€‹mg/L (SD, 91.16) vs. 90.14 (SD, 85.73)). The absolute levels of IL-6 and CRP were higher than those of previous depression studies, and differences were only found for the subgroup of De Novo depressive or adjustment disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Serum concentrations of IL-6 and CRP are higher in COVID-19 patients with De Novo but not persistent depressive or adjustment disorders. Clinical features such as fatigue, asthenia, anhedonia, or anxiety can be the basis for this finding.

[Catatonia: Back to the future of the neuropsychiatric syndrome]. / Catatonia: regreso al futuro del síndrome neuropsiquiátrico.

Catatonia is an undertreated and underdiagnosed neuropsychiatric syndrome whose prognosis is benign if treated early, thus avoiding possible complications and compromising the health of patients. The latest epidemiological studies indicate a prevalence of catatonia of 9.2%, being frequent in medical pathologies (especially neurological ones), as well as in psychiatric pathologies. The use of validated scales is recommended for its diagnosis, to be able to measure the severity and response to treatment. Once catatonia has been identified, it is necessary to perform a protocolized diagnostic study of the underlying aetiology («Catatonia Workup¼). Treatment of choice is benzodiazepines and electroconvulsive therapy. In recent years, new therapeutic alternatives such as non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation have emerged. In this review we propose several initiatives to promote the dissemination and knowledge of catatonia in the clinical setting.

Mental disorders, psychopharmacological treatments, and mortality in 2150 COVID-19 Spanish inpatients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how mental disorders and psychopharmacological treatments before and during COVID-19 hospital admissions are related to mortality. METHODS: Subjects included in the study were all adult patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19, confirmed clinically and by PCR, who were admitted to a tertiary university hospital in Badalona (Spain) between March 1 and November 17, 2020. Data were extracted anonymously from computerized clinical records. RESULTS: 2,150 subjects were included, 57% males, mean age 61 years. History of mental disorders was registered in 957 (45%). Throughout admission, de novo diagnosis of mood or anxiety, stress, or adjustment disorder was made in 12% of patients without previous history. Delirium was diagnosed in 10% of cases. 1011 patients (47%) received a psychotropic prescription during admission (36% benzodiazepines, 22% antidepressants, and 21% antipsychotics). Mortality rate was 17%. Delirium during admission and history of mood disorder were independently associated with higher mortality risk (hazard ratios, 1.39 and 1.52 respectively), while previous year's treatments with anxiolytics/hypnotics and antidepressants were independently associated with lower mortality risk (hazard ratios, 0.47 and 0.43, respectively). CONCLUSION: Mental symptoms are very common in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection. Detecting, diagnosing, and treating them is key to determining the prognosis of the disease and functional recovery.

Use of Mental Health Services for Patients Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorders in Primary Care.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most disabling diseases worldwide, generating high use of health services. Previous studies have shown that Mental Health Services (MHS) use is associated with patient and Family Physician (FP) factors. The aim of this study was to investigate MHS use in a naturalistic sample of MDD outpatients and the factors influencing use of services in specialized psychiatric care, to know the natural mental healthcare pathway. Non-randomized clinical trial including newly depressed Primary Care (PC) patients (n = 263) with a 12-month follow-up (from 2013 to 2015). Patient sociodemographic variables were assessed along with clinical variables (mental disorder diagnosis, severity of depression or anxiety, quality of life, disability, beliefs about illness and medication). FP (n = 53) variables were also evaluated. A multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with public or private MHS use. Subjects were clustered by FP. Having previously used MHS was associated with the use of MHS. The use of public MHS was associated with worse perception of quality of life. No other sociodemographic, clinical, nor FP variables were associated with the use of MHS. Patient self-perception is a factor that influences the use of services, in addition to having used them before. This is in line with Value-Based Healthcare, which propose to put the focus on the patient, who is the one who must define which health outcomes are relevant to him.

Catatonia in elderly psychiatric inpatients is not always associated with intense anxiety: Factor analysis and correlation with psychopathology.

OBJECTIVE: Catatonic stupor has been linked to extreme fear. Whether the underlying phenomenology of every catatonic dimension is intense anxiety or fear remains unknown. METHODS: One hundred and six patients aged ≥64 years were assessed for catatonia and clinical variables during the first 24 hours of admission. Two-sample t test were used to test for group differences. A principal component analysis was developed. Analysis of variance was performed to assess for differences in the diagnostic groups. Correlation coefficients were used to examine the association between catatonic dimensions and psychopathological variables. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between catatonic and non-catatonic patients in the Hamilton and NPI scores. The three factor-model accounted for 52.23% of the variance. Factor 1 loaded on items concerned with "excitement," factor 2 on "inhibition" items, and factor 3 on "parakinetic" items. There was a significant effect for factor 1 (F [5.36] = 2.83, P = .02), and not significant for factor 2 and factor 3. Compared with patients with depression, patients with mania scored significantly higher on factor "excitement" (P < .05). Factor 2 showed a moderate correlation with Hamilton total score (r = .346, P = .031) and Hamilton psychic score (r = .380, P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Catatonic patients experienced more anxiety and hyperactivity. A three-factor solution provided best fit for catatonic symptoms. Patients with mania scored highest on Excitement, patients with depression on Inhibition, and patients with schizophrenia on Parakinetic. The main finding in this study was a positive moderate correlation between the Hamilton psychic score and the Inhibition factor score, meaning that not every catatonic dimension is associated to intense anxiety.

Cost-effectiveness of antidepressants versus active monitoring for mild-to-moderate major depressive disorder: a multisite non-randomized-controlled trial in primary care (INFAP study).

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of antidepressants vs active monitoring (AM) for patients with mild-moderate major depressive disorder. METHODS: This was a 12-month observational prospective controlled trial. Adult patients with a new episode of major depression were invited to participate and assigned to AM or antidepressants according to General Practitioners' clinical judgment and experience. Patients were evaluated at baseline, and 6 and 12-month follow-up. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained were estimated and used to calculate incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) from the healthcare and government perspective. To minimize the bias resulting from non-randomization, a propensity score-based method was used. RESULTS: At 6 and 12-month follow-up, ICUR was 2549 €/QALY and 6,142 €/QALY, respectively, in favor of antidepressants. At 6 months, for a willingness to pay (WTP) of 25,000 €/QALY, antidepressants had a probability of 0.89 (healthcare perspective) and 0.81 (government perspective) of being more cost-effective than AM. At 12 months, this probability was 0.86 (healthcare perspective) and 0.73 (government perspective). CONCLUSIONS: Incremental cost-utility ratios favor pharmacological treatment as a first-line approach for patients with mild-moderate major depressive disorder. While our results should be interpreted with caution and further real world research is needed, clinical practice guidelines should consider antidepressant therapy for mild-moderate major depressive patients as an alternative to active monitoring in PC.

Diagnostic accuracy and treatment approach to depression in primary care: predictive factors.

Objective: The study assessed the predictive factors of diagnostic accuracy and treatment approach (antidepressants versus active monitoring) for depression in primary care. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that uses information from a naturalistic prospective controlled trial performed in Barcelona (Spain) enrolling newly diagnosed patients with mild to moderate depression by GPs. Treatment approach was based on clinical judgement. Diagnosis was later assessed according to DSM-IV criteria using Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) interview by an external researcher. Patients (sociodemographic, psychiatric diagnosis, severity of depression and anxiety, health-related quality of life, disability, beliefs about medication and illness and comorbidities) and GP factors associated with diagnostic accuracy and treatment approach were assessed using multilevel logistic regression. Variables with missing data were imputed through multiple imputations. Results: Two hundred sixty-three patients were recruited by 53 GPs. Mean age was 51 years (SD = 15). Thirty percent met DSM-IV criteria for major depression. Mean depression symptomatology was moderate-severe. Using multivariate analyses, patients' beliefs about medicines were the only variable associated with the antidepressant approach. Specialization in general medicine and being a resident tutor were associated with a more accurate diagnosis. Conclusions: Clinical depression diagnosis by GPs was not always associated with a formal diagnosis through a SCID-I. GPs' training background was central to an adequate depression diagnosis. Patients' beliefs in medication were the only factor associated with treatment approach. More resources should be allocated to improving the diagnosis of depression.

Impact of initial medication non-adherence to SSRIs on medical visits and sick leaves.

BACKGROUND: Initial medication non-adherence (IMNA) to antidepressants, which are commonly used to treat depression in primary care (PC), is around 6-12%. Although it is well known that post-initial non-adherence to antidepressants increases the cost of depression, the impact of IMNA on cost is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of IMNA to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) on medical visits and sick leave in patients with depression treated in PC in Catalonia (Spain). METHODS: This was a four-year retrospective register-based study (2011-2014). All PC patients of working age who received a new SSRI prescription and had a diagnosis of depression were included (N = 79,642). Treatment initiation, number of visits and days on sick leave were gathered from the database. We assessed the impact of IMNA on costs with ordered logistic regressions. RESULTS: The 3-year incidence of IMNA was 15%. Initially non-adherent patients made a lesser number of GP visits (OR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.79-0.84) but had more days on sick leave (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.20-1.31). There were no differences in the number of specialist visits (OR = 1.04; 95% CI = 0.99-1.08). LIMITATIONS: Differences between adherent and non-adherent patients could be explained by non-observed variables. GP recognition and documentation of depression might be inaccurate. Costs of unpaid work and use of hospital services were not considered. CONCLUSIONS: Although IMNA decreases the use of medical PC services, it increases the number of days on sick leave. This could also indicate worse health status. These consequences are currently overlooked when considering post-initial medication non-adherence.

Attachment styles and clinical correlates in people at ultra high risk for psychosis.

Evidence suggests that attachment styles may influence subclinical psychosis phenotypes (schizotypy) and affective disorders and may play a part in the association between psychosis and childhood adversity. However, the role of attachment in the initial stages of psychosis remains poorly understood. Our main aim was to describe and compare attachment styles in 60 individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis (UHR) and a matched sample of 60 healthy volunteers (HV). The HV had lower anxious and avoidant attachment scores than the UHR individuals (p < .001). Sixty-nine percentage of the UHR group had more than one DSM-IV diagnosis, mainly affective and anxiety disorders. The UHR group experienced more trauma (p < .001) and more mood and anxiety symptoms (p < .001). Interestingly, in our UHR group, only schizotypy paranoia was correlated with insecure attachment. In the HV group, depression, anxiety, schizotypy paranoia, and social anxiety were correlated with insecure attachment. This difference and some discrepancies with previous studies involving UHR suggest that individuals at UHR may compose a heterogeneous group; some experience significant mood and/or anxiety symptoms that may not be explained by specific attachment styles. Nonetheless, measuring attachment in UHR individuals could help maximize therapeutic relationships to enhance recovery.

Comparing watchful waiting with antidepressants for the management of subclinical depression symptoms to mild-moderate depression in primary care: a systematic review.

Background: The benefits of watchful waiting (WW) over antidepressants (ADs) for the treatment of depression in primary care (PC) are unclear. Objective: We aimed to systematically review the evidence supporting either WW or ADs for the treatment of subclinical depressive symptoms and mild-moderate depression in a PC setting. Methods: This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (42016036345). Four electronic sources (EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge) were systematically searched from inception to November 2016 for controlled trials comparing WW and ADs in PC following established guidelines. The studies had to include adult population with new symptoms of subclinical depression or mild-moderate depression. Patients in the intervention group should receive a WW approach, while patients in the control group underwent treatment with ADs. The abstraction form included information on the setting, characteristics of the study population, total sample size, size of the control and intervention groups and date of the study. Outcome measures and variability were extracted. Results: The scarcity of studies and the considerable clinical and methodological heterogeneity discouraged us from performing a meta-analysis. Three articles were included and qualitatively synthesized. There was no evidence for the superiority of one treatment option over the other, although two of the studies suggested small differences in favour of ADs when less conservative analyses were conducted (per protocol analysis and analysis not adjusted for missingness predictors). Conclusions: Superiority was not demonstrated by either treatment option. More robust evidence is needed to inform recommendations for the management of depressive symptoms in PC.

Prevalence and characteristics of catatonia on admission to an acute geriatric psychiatry ward.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to describe the prevalence of catatonia in a population of older acute psychiatric inpatients according to different diagnostic criteria. Secondary objectives are: to compare the catatonic symptom profile, prevalence, and severity, in respect to the underlying aetiology, and to evaluate the association between catatonic and somatic comorbidity. METHODS: The study included 106 patients admitted to an acute geriatric psychiatry ward. Catatonia was assessed using the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS). RESULTS: Catatonia was highly prevalent (n=42; 39.6%), even when using restrictive diagnostic criteria: Fink and Taylor (n=19; 17.9%) and DSM 5 (n=22; 20.8%). Depression was the most frequent psychiatric syndrome among catatonic patients (n=18; 42.8%). Catatonia was more frequent in depression (48.6%) and delirium (66.7%). Affective disorders showed a higher risk than psychotic disorders to develop catatonia (OR=2.68; 95% CI 1.09-6.61). This association was not statistically significant when controlling for dementia and geriatric syndromes. The most prevalent catatonic signs were excitement (64.3%), verbigeration (61.9%), negativism (59.5%), immobility/stupor (57.1%), and staring (52.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Catatonia in older psychiatric inpatients was highly prevalent. Depression was the most common psychiatric syndrome among catatonic patients, and catatonia was more frequent in depression and mania, as well as in delirium. Affective disorders were associated with a higher risk of developing catatonia compared to psychotic disorders. Somatic and cognitive comorbidity played a crucial aetiological role in catatonia in this series.

Adicción frente a seudoadicción / Addiction versus pseudoaddiction

El uso extendido de los opioides, sobre todo los fentanilos de acción rápida para el tratamiento del dolor oncológico, ha producido la aparición de conductas aberrantes asociadas a su administración prolongada y un resurgimiento de antiguos mitos de la morfina como la adicción; hoy día se manejan nuevos términos: seudoadicción, seudotolerancia y afrontamiento químico (chemical coping). En este artículo se analizan los distintos conceptos y comportamientos que deben hacer sospechar estos diagnósticos, los factores asociados al riesgo de mal uso de opioides, así como las recomendaciones terapéuticas para realizar una prescripción segura y eficiente. Para prevenir la aparición de adicción, seudoadicción y afrontamiento químico en un paciente con dolor asociado al cáncer, es necesario un abordaje multidisciplinar de cada una de sus dimensiones (física, psicológica, social y espiritual), con especial interés en el manejo de la ansiedad y la depresión

The widespread use of opioids, especially fast-acting fentanyl preparations for the treatment of cancer pain, has produced the development of aberrant behaviors during the chronic opioid therapy, and a resurgence of old myths about morphine addiction. Nowadays, new terms are used such as pseudoaddiction, pseudotolerance and chemical coping. In this article, we analyze the different concepts and behaviors that should lead clinicians to suspect these diagnoses, the factors associated with opioid misuse and the treatment recommendations for safe and efficient prescription. To prevent the development of addiction, pseudoaddiction and chemical coping in patients with cancer pain, a multidisciplinary approach is required for each of its factors (physical, psychological, social and spiritual), with special emphasis on the management of anxiety and depression